United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Johnson et al
Filing
76
ORDER granting 75 Joint Motion To Vacate Trial Date. This action is closed administratively. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/20/16.(kfinn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00299-REB-CBS
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
KRISTINE L. JOHNSON,
TROY A. BARNES, and
WORK WITH TROY BARNES, INC. (d/b/a THE ACHIEVE COMMUNITY),
Defendants,
and
ACHIEVE INTERNATIONAL, LLC,
Relief Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO VACATE TRIAL DATE
AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE
Blackburn, J.
The matter before the court is the parties' Joint Motion To Vacate Trial Date
[#75],1 filed April 18, 2016. After careful review of the motion and the file, I conclude the
motion should be granted. Moreover, given the reasons necessitating a vacatur of the
trial, I find it appropriate to administratively close this case.
THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Joint Motion To Vacate Trial Date [#75], filed April 18, 2016, is
granted;
1
“[#75]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
2. That the jury trial set to commence December 5, 2016, is vacated and
continued without date, pending further order of the court;
3. That the combined Final Pretrial Conference/Trial Preparation Conference set
November 18, 2016, is vacated and continued without date, pending further order of the
court;
4. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, this action is closed administratively; and
5. That the clerk of the court is directed to close this civil action administratively,
subject to reopening for good cause.
Dated April 20, 2016 at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?