Burnell v. Colvin

Filing 22

ORDER granting 21 Motion for Attorney Fees. Entered by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/27/15.(jhawk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-00308-WYD RICHARD BURNELL, Plaintiff, vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER GRAINTING THE PARTIES’ STIPULATED MOTION FOR FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT The parties’ Stipulated Motion for Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED. Defendant shall pay Plaintiff $3,985.00 in attorney fees. Payment of this amount shall constitute a complete release from and bar to any and all claims Plaintiff may have relating to EAJA fees in connection with this action. However, the EAJA award is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s attorney’s right to seek attorney fees pursuant to Social Security Act § 206(b), 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(c)(1) (2006). Under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct 2521, 2528-29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). Thus, fees should be paid to Plaintiff. However, Plaintiff assigned his right to EAJA fees to his attorney. Thus, if, after receiving the Court’s EAJA fee order, the Commissioner (1) determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program; and (2) agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, then the EAJA fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney. However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner will pay the remaining EAJA fees after offset by a check made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff’s attorney.   Dated: August 27, 2015 BY THE COURT:                               /s/ Wiley Y. Daniel                    WILEY Y. DANIEL,  SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?