Burry v. CACH, LLC et al

Filing 33

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The Stipulation to Dismiss ECF No. 32 is hereby APPROVED. All claims against Defendants in this matter are dismissed with prejudice, and parties shall bear their own costs and fees associated with this matter. The matter is hereby closed by agreement of both parties, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 9/29/2015. (evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-00366-WYD-CBS DEVITT BURRY Plaintiff, v. CACH, LLC, et al., Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ On April 29, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (ECF No. 28), asking the Court to dismiss all of his claims against the Defendant in this matter. Defendants filed their Response to the Motion on May 1, 2015 (ECF No. 30). At that time, the parties were not in agreement as to whether the dismissal should be with or without prejudice, nor were they in agreement about whether the parties should bear their own costs and fees associated with this matter. On September 21, 2015, the parties jointly filed a Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice (ECF No. 32), indicating agreement that the parties would bear their own costs and fees associated with this matter. The Stipulation to Dismiss (ECF No. 32) is hereby APPROVED. The Motion to Dismiss filed previously (ECF No. 28) is hereby DENIED as moot. All claims against Defendants in this matter are dismissed with prejudice, and parties shall bear their own costs and fees associated with this matter. The matter is hereby closed by agreement of both parties. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Dated: September 29, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/ Wiley Y. Daniel WILEY Y. DANIEL, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?