Burry v. CACH, LLC et al
Filing
33
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The Stipulation to Dismiss ECF No. 32 is hereby APPROVED. All claims against Defendants in this matter are dismissed with prejudice, and parties shall bear their own costs and fees associated with this matter. The matter is hereby closed by agreement of both parties, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 9/29/2015. (evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.
15-cv-00366-WYD-CBS
DEVITT BURRY
Plaintiff,
v.
CACH, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
On April 29, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (ECF No. 28),
asking the Court to dismiss all of his claims against the Defendant in this matter.
Defendants filed their Response to the Motion on May 1, 2015 (ECF No. 30). At that
time, the parties were not in agreement as to whether the dismissal should be with or
without prejudice, nor were they in agreement about whether the parties should bear their
own costs and fees associated with this matter.
On September 21, 2015, the parties jointly filed a Stipulation to Dismiss with
Prejudice (ECF No. 32), indicating agreement that the parties would bear their own costs
and fees associated with this matter.
The Stipulation to Dismiss (ECF No. 32) is hereby APPROVED. The Motion to
Dismiss filed previously (ECF No. 28) is hereby DENIED as moot. All claims against
Defendants in this matter are dismissed with prejudice, and parties shall bear their own
costs and fees associated with this matter. The matter is hereby closed by agreement
of both parties. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.
Dated: September 29, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
WILEY Y. DANIEL,
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?