Connolly et al v. Toll Brothers, Inc.
Filing
22
ORDER approving Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. 9 Petitioners' Motion To Vacate Second Arbitration Award, 10 (1) Motion To Dismiss Petitioners' Amended Motion To Confirm Arbitration Award and Enter Judgment; and (2) Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs Pursuant to Rule 11, and 12 Petitioners' Motion To Strike Respondent's Motion To Dismiss is denied as moot. by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 6/23/2015. (mlace, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00380-REB-KMT
MICHAEL CONNOLLY, and
KELLY CONNOLLY,
Petitioners,
v.
TOLL BROTHERS, INC.,
Respondent.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice [#21]1
filed June 22, 2015. After careful review of the stipulation and the file, I conclude that
the stipulation should be approved and that this action should be dismissed with
prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice is approved;
2. That the Petitioners’ Motion To Vacate Second Arbitration Award [#9]
filed April 6, 2015, is denied as moot;
3. That the Respondent’s: (1) Motion To Dismiss Petitioners’ Amended
Motion To Confirm Arbitration Award and Enter Judgment; and (2) Motion for
Attorneys Fees and Costs Pursuant to Rule 11 [#10] filed April 10, 2015, is denied as
1
“[#21]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
moot;
4. That the Petitioners’ Motion To Strike Respondent’s Motion To Dismiss
[#12] filed May 1, 2015, is denied as moot; and
5. That this action is dismissed with prejudice with the parties to pay their own
attorney fees and costs.
Dated June 23, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?