HealthTrio, Inc. et al v. Merrick et al

Filing 18

ORDER The request to dismiss the objection 14 stated in the Defendants' Joint Notice of Mootness of Objection To Judge Tallman's order Denying Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order [Dk. 14] 16 filed November 18, 2015, is gran ted. The Defendants' Joint Objection To Judge Tallman's Order Denying Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order 14 filed November 4, 2014, is dismissed and terminated on the docket. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/25/2015. (mlace, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 15-cv-00455-REB (Bankruptcy Case No. 09-34404 HRT (Chapter 7), Adversary Proceeding No. 14-01215 HRT) In re: HEALTHTRIO, INC., Debtor. DAVID E. LEWIS, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, Plaintiff, v. GLEN W. MERRICK, G.W. MERRICK & ASSOCIATES, LLC, ASMA GULL HASAN, Defendants. ORDER Blackburn, J. This matter is before me on the following: (1) Defendants’ Joint Objection To Judge Tallman’s Order Denying Defendants’ Motion for a Protective Order [#14]1 filed November 4, 2014; and (2) Defendants’ Joint Notice of Mootness of Objection To Judge Tallman’s order Denying Defendants’ Motion for a Protective Order [Dk. 14] [#16] filed November 18, 2015. In the notice of mootness [#16], the defendants 1 “[#14]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. report that the objection [#14] has been resolved and now is moot. As a result, the defendants request that the objection be dismissed. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the request to dismiss the objection [#14] stated in the Defendants’ Joint Notice of Mootness of Objection To Judge Tallman’s order Denying Defendants’ Motion for a Protective Order [Dk. 14] [#16] filed November 18, 2015, is granted; and 2. That the Defendants’ Joint Objection To Judge Tallman’s Order Denying Defendants’ Motion for a Protective Order [#14] filed November 4, 2014, is dismissed and terminated on the docket. Dated November 25, 2015, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?