Rodriguez-Aguirre v. USA

Filing 38

MINUTE ORDER; 37 Motion to Clarify Allegations of the Complaint and/or Leave to Amend is DENIED without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/14/15.(morti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00465-KLM
GABRIEL RODRIGUEZ-AGUIRRE,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Clarify Allegations of the
Complaint and/or Leave to Amend [#37]1 (the “Motion”).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#37] is DENIED without prejudice. If
Plaintiff, who proceeds in this matter pro se, is seeking leave to file an Amended Complaint,
he must file a motion which complies with the federal and local rules, namely, Fed. R. Civ.
P. 15, and which includes the proposed Amended Complaint as a document separate from
the Motion. The Court will not permit piecemeal adjudication of Plaintiff’s case, thus
Plaintiff must include all claims he seeks to bring and defendants he intends to name in the
proposed Amended Complaint.
Dated: September 14, 2015

1

“[#37]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.