Donovan v. Colvin

Filing 20

ORDER The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) by filing the Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge 13 . That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a) and (b) this action shall be co-assigned to a full-time magistrate judge. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/4/2015. (mlace, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00516-REB
RANDALL A. DONOVAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

ORDER
Blackburn, J.
Proceeding under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d), the parties have consented to the
jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) by filing the Consent to the
Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge [#13],1 filed
September 4, 2015. Thus, the case should be drawn to a magistrate judge.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a) and (b) this action shall be co-assigned
to a full-time magistrate judge;
2. That the case caption shall include the initials of both the district judge and the
magistrate judge to whom the case is assigned; and
3. That once a magistrate judge has been co-assigned, this court will issue an
order of reference under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(e) reassigning the action to the
magistrate judge currently co-assigned to the case.
1

“[#17]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.

Dated December 4, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

2