Johns Manville Corporation et al v. Knauf Insulation, LLC et al

Filing 83

STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY PROTECTIVE ORDER. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 09/01/2015. (athom, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-00531-RBJ
JOHNS MANVILLE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and
JOHNS MANVILLE, a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
KNAUF INSULATION, INC., a Delaware corporation,
WALTER A. JOHNSON, individually,
KNAUF INSULATION GMBH, a German corporation,
Defendants.

STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY PROTECTIVE ORDER

I.

INTRODUCTION
The parties, by their undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1),

hereby stipulate to and move the Court to enter the following protective order
concerning the treatment of confidential information.
II.

SCOPE OF PROTECTED INFORMATION
In the course of discovery in this action, the parties may be required to produce

information that constitutes, in whole or in part, protected information such as trade
secrets, non-public research and development, commercial or financial information, or
other information that may cause harm to the producing party or a non-party. The
parties anticipate production of the following categories of protected information:
technical documentation (e.g., formulas for alloy chemistry and/or composition,

manufacturing processes, test results, lab notebooks, vendor specifications and
communications), financial information (e.g., sales numbers, revenue, cost, and profit
information), sensitive competitive business information (e.g., analyses regarding
decisions to develop or

launch new products, internal emails, notes, and meeting

minutes reflecting strategy discussions regarding new products, pricing, and
competition).
III.

DESIGNATION OF PROTECTED INFORMATION
A.

Scope: This Order governs the production and handling of any protected

information in this action. Any party or non-party who produces protected information in
this action may designate it as “Confidential” or “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” consistent with
the terms of this Order.

“Designating Party” means the party or non-party who so

designates the protected information; “Receiving Party” means the party or non-party to
whom such information was produced or disclosed.

Whenever possible, the

Designating Party must designate only those portions of a document, deposition,
transcript, or other material that contain the protected information and refrain from
designating entire documents. Regardless of any designations made hereunder, the
Designating Party is not otherwise restricted from use or disclosure of its protected
information outside of this action. In addition, any party may move to modify or seek
other relief from any of the terms of this Order if it has first tried in writing and in good
faith to resolve its needs or disputes with the other party(ies) pursuant to the terms of
this Order and D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1.

2

B.

Application to Non-Parties:

Before a non-party is given copies of

designated information as permitted hereunder, it must first sign the acknowledgment to
be bound to these terms that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; if it fails to do so, the
parties to this action must resolve any such dispute before making disclosure of
designated information as permitted hereunder to the non-party. If a non-party wishes
to make designations hereunder, it must first sign the acknowledgment to be bound to
these terms that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
C.

Timing and Provisional Protection: Designations may be made at any

time. To avoid potential waiver of protection hereunder, the Designating Party should
designate information at the time of production or disclosure, including on the record
during the taking of any testimony. Deposition testimony will be deemed provisionally
protected for a period of 30 days after the transcript is released to the parties by the
court reporter, although the parties may agree at any time to different timelines of
provisional protection of information as Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only as part of
one or more specific depositions. To retain any designations beyond the provisional
period, a Designating Party must designate specific pages and lines of deposition
testimony before the provisional period has expired. Such designations must be made
in writing so that all counsel and court reporters may append the designation to all
copies of the transcripts.
D.

Manner of Designation: Information may be designated hereunder in any

reasonable manner or method that notifies the Receiving Party of the designation level
and identifies with specificity the information to which the designation applies. If made

3

verbally, the Designating Party must promptly confirm in writing the designation.
Whenever possible, the Designating Party should stamp, affix, or embed a legend of
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” on each designated page of the
document or electronic image.
IV.

CHALLENGES TO DESIGNATED INFORMATION
In the event that a Receiving Party disagrees at any time with any designation(s)

made by the Designating Party, the Receiving Party must first try to resolve such
challenge in good faith on an informal basis with the Designating Party pursuant to
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1. The Receiving Party must provide written notice of the challenge
and the grounds therefor to the Designating Party, who must respond in writing to the
challenge within 15 days. At all times, the Designating Party carries the burden of
establishing the propriety of the designation and protection level. Unless and until the
challenge is resolved by the parties or ruled upon by the Court, the designated
information will remain protected under this Order. The failure of any Receiving Party to
challenge a designation does not constitute a concession that the designation is proper
or an admission that the designated information is otherwise competent, relevant, or
material.
V.

LIMITED ACCESS/USE OF PROTECTED INFORMATION
A.

Restricted Use: Information that is produced or exchanged in the course

of this action and designated under this Order may be used solely for the preparation,
trial, and any appeal of this action, as well as related settlement negotiations and for no
other purpose, without the written consent of the Designating Party. No designated

4

information may be disclosed to any person except in accordance with the terms of this
Order.

All persons in possession of designated information agree to exercise

reasonable care with regard to the custody, use, or storage of such information to
ensure that its confidentiality is maintained. This obligation includes, but is not limited
to, the Receiving Party providing to the Designating Party prompt notice of the receipt of
any subpoena that seeks production or disclosure of any designated information and
consulting with the Designating Party before responding to the subpoena. Any use or
disclosure of Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only information in violation of the terms of
this Order may subject the disclosing person or party to sanctions.
B.

Access to “Confidential” Information: The parties and all persons subject

to this Order agree that information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” may only be
accessed or reviewed by the following:
1. The Court, its personnel, and court reporters;
2. Counsel of record for any party in this action and their employees who
assist counsel of record in this action and are informed of the duties
hereunder;
3. The parties, including their agents and employees who are assisting
or have reason to know of this action, so long as each such agent or
employee has signed the acknowledgment to be bound to these terms
that is attached hereto as Exhibit A;
4. Experts or consultants employed by the parties or their counsel for
purposes of this action, so long as each such expert or consultant has

5

signed the acknowledgment to be bound to these terms that is
attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
5. Other witnesses or persons with the Designating Party’s consent or by
court order, so long as each such witness or person has signed the
acknowledgment to be bound to these terms that is attached hereto as
Exhibit A.
C.

Access to “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Designations:

The parties and all

persons subject to this Order agree that information designated as “ATTORNEYS’
EYES ONLY” may only be accessed or reviewed by the following:
1. The Court, its personnel, and court reporters;
2. Counsel of record for any party in this action and their employees who
assist counsel of record in this action and are informed of the duties
hereunder;
3. Experts or consultants employed by the parties or their counsel for
purposes of this action, so long as each such expert or consultant has
signed the acknowledgment to be bound to these terms that is
attached hereto as Exhibit A and as to whom the procedures set forth
in Paragraph V.D. below have been followed; and
4. Other witnesses or persons to whom the Designating Party agrees in
advance of disclosure or by court order, so long as each such witness
or person has signed the acknowledgment to be bound to these terms
that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

6

5. Walter A. Johnson also wishes to review certain JM materials that are
marked AEO on the basis that he has already seen or already has
knowledge of the information contained therein. Dr. Johnson’s counsel
shall identify in writing the production number(s) of any such
documents to JM, requesting permission to share the documents or
contents with Dr. Johnson. JM shall have ten (10) days to review and
approve or reject disclosure of the identified documents.
D.

Client Consultation: The parties understand and agree that in the context

of settlement discussions, it may be necessary to provide corporate decision-makers
with access to certain “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” financial information of the other party. If
this occurs, the parties agree to work in good faith to identify any such relevant
information and to coordinate to share such information, in all instances conditioned
upon the prior written consent of the Designating Party. Nothing in this Order shall
prevent counsel from relying on examination of designated information to render advice
to their respective clients who are parties to this litigation, provided all requirements of
this Protective Order are observed, including all requirements pertaining to “Attorneys’
Eyes Only” information.
E.

Procedures for Approving/Objecting to Disclosure of “Attorneys’ Eyes

Only” Information/Items to Experts: Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed to
in writing by the Designating Party, a party that seeks to disclose to an expert or
consultant any information or item that has been designated “Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
pursuant to Paragraph V.C.4 above first must make a written disclosure to the

7

Designating Party that (1) sets forth the full name of the person and the city and state of
his/her primary residence, (2) attaches a copy of the person’s current resume, (3)
identifies the person’s current employer(s), (4) identifies each source from whom the
person has received compensation or funding for work in his/her areas of expertise or to
whom the person has provided professional services, including in connection with a
litigation, at any time during the preceding five years, 1 and (5) identifies any litigation in
connection with which the person has offered expert testimony, including through a
declaration, report, or testimony at a deposition or trial, during the preceding five years.
A party that has made such a written disclosure and provided the information specified
may disclose the subject protected information to the identified person unless, within
seven days of delivering the disclosure, the party receives a written objection from the
Designating Party.

A party that receives a timely written objection must meet and

confer to try to resolve such objection in good faith on an informal basis with the
Designating Party pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 within seven (7) days of the written
objection. If no agreement is reached, the party seeking to make the disclosure to the
expert may request a telephonic conference with the Magistrate Judge to discuss the
issue, following which the party may move for an order seeking permission from the
court to make the disclosure. In any such proceeding, the party opposing disclosure to
the expert shall bear the burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure

1

If the expert believes any of this information is subject to a confidentiality obligation to a third party, then
the expert should provide whatever information the expert believes can be disclosed without violating any
confidentiality agreements, and the party seeking to disclose to the expert shall be available to meet and
confer with the Designating Party regarding any such engagement.

8

would entail (under any safeguards proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to
disclose the protected information to its expert.
F.

Review of Witness Acknowledgments: At any time and for any purpose,

including to monitor compliance with the terms hereof, any Designating Party may
demand to review all executed copies of Exhibit A in any Receiving Party’s possession.
The Receiving Party must, within three (3) business days of the demand, provide all
such copies to the Designating Party making the demand.
G.

Non-Waiver Effect of Designations: Neither the taking of, nor the failure to

take, any action to enforce the provisions of this Order, nor the failure to object to any
designation, will constitute a waiver of any party’s claim or defense in this action or any
other action or proceeding, including but not limited to a claim or defense that any
designated information is or is not confidential, is or is not entitled to particular
protection, or embodies or does not embody information protectable by law.
H.

In-Court Use of Designated Information:

If information designated

pursuant to this Order will or may be offered in evidence at a hearing or trial, then the
offering party must give advance notice to the party or non-party that designated prior to
offering the information so that any use or disclosure may be addressed in accordance
with the Court’s case-management or other pre-trial order, or by a motion in limine.
Nothing in this Order shall be construed as a waiver by a party of any objections that
may be raised as to the admissibility at trial of any evidentiary materials.
I.

Prosecution Bar: Absent written consent from the Designating Party, any

individual who receives access to “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information shall not be

9

involved in the prosecution of patents or patent applications relating, in whole or in part,
to the design, composition, fabrication, manufacture and operation of spinners, including
without limitation the patent(s) asserted in this action and any patent or application
claiming priority to or otherwise related to the patents asserted in this action, before any
foreign or domestic agency, including the United States Patent and Trademark Office
(“the Patent Office”). For purposes of this paragraph, “prosecution” includes directly or
indirectly drafting, amending, advising, or otherwise affecting the scope or maintenance
of claims in a pending patent application. To avoid any doubt, “prosecution” as used in
this paragraph does not include representing a party challenging a patent before a
domestic or foreign agency (including, but not limited to, a reissue protest, ex parte
reexamination, or inter partes review) or representing or advising a patent owner in such
an agency proceeding. This Prosecution Bar shall not prevent any affected individual
from disclosing non-confidential prior art or non-confidential discovery or Court filings to
an attorney involved in prosecution for purposes of ensuring that such prior art is
submitted to the Patent Office (or any similar agency of a foreign government), to assist
a patent applicant or patentee in complying with its duty of candor. This Prosecution
Bar shall begin when access to “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information is first received by
the affected individual and shall end two (2) years after final termination of this action.
VI.

CLAW-BACK REQUESTS
A.

Failure to Make Designation:

If, at any time, a party or non-party

discovers that it produced or disclosed protected information without designation, it may
promptly notify the Receiving Party and identify with particularity the information to be

10

designated and the level of designation (the claw-back notification). The Receiving
Party may then request substitute production of the newly-designated information.
Within 30 days of receiving the claw-back notification, the Receiving Party must (1)
certify to the Designating Party it has appropriately marked or, if substitute production
has been requested, destroyed all unmarked copies that it received, made, and/or
distributed; and (2) if it was practicably unable to mark or destroy any information
because disclosures occurred while the Receiving Party was under no duty of
confidentiality under the terms of this Order regarding that information, the Receiving
Party must reasonably provide as much information as practicable to aid the
Designating Party in protecting the information, consistently with the Receiving Party’s
attorney-client, work-product, and/or trial-preparation privileges.
B.

Inadvertent Production of Privileged Information: If, at any time, a party

discovers that it produced information that it reasonably believes is subject to protection
under the attorney/client, work-product, or trial-preparation privileges, then it must
promptly notify each Receiving Party of the claim for protection, the basis for it, amend
its privilege log accordingly, and comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5).

Whenever

possible, the producing party must produce substitute information that redacts the
information subject to the claimed protection. The Receiving Party must thereupon
comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5) as to the information subject to the claimed
protection. The parties must also comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 before seeking
Court intervention to resolve any related dispute.

11

VII.

DURATION/CONTINUED RESTRICTIONS
A.

Handling of Designated Information Upon Conclusion of Action: Upon

conclusion of this action, including all appeals, the Designating Party(ies) is/are
responsible for ensuring that any party or person to whom the party shared or disclosed
designated information in this action returns or destroys all of its copies, regardless of
the medium in which it was stored. Within 60 days after the later of dismissal of this
action or expiration of all deadlines for appeal, the Receiving Party(ies) must certify to
each Designating Party that all designated information hereunder has been destroyed
by all parties and witnesses for whom that party is responsible. No witness or party
may retain designated information that it received from any other party or non-party
under this Order; only counsel of record are the authorized agents who may retain one
copy for their respective legal files, and who must also describe to the Designating Party
the extra steps taken to seal its legal file containing paper and/or electronic copies of
the designated information so that it is not accessed, used, or disclosed inconsistently
with the obligations under this Order. This provision does not apply to the Court or
Court staff.
B.

Continued Restrictions Under this Order: The restrictions on disclosure

and use of confidential information survive the conclusion of this action.

VIII.

USE OF INFORMATION IN COURT PROCEEDINGS
A.

Status Between Parties Survives In-Court Use: In the event confidential

information is used in any court filing or proceeding in this action, including but not

12

limited to its use at trial, it shall not lose its confidential status as between the Parties
through such use.
B.

Sealing Court Records: Confidential information and pleadings or briefs

quoting or discussing confidential information will not be accepted for filing “under seal”
or otherwise kept out of the public record in this action except by court order issued
upon motion of the party seeking to file the documents under seal. Any request to
restrict access must comply with the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2. In the event
a Party seeks to use, quote or discuss confidential information in pleadings, briefs or in
open court, the Party doing so shall move to file the information with the court “under
seal.” Any such motion requesting leave to file documents under seal shall comply with
the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2 and demonstrate that the confidential
information at issue is entitled to protection under the standards articulated in Nixon v.
Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978) (information that might harm litigant's
competitive standing ) (cited in United States v. Hickey, 767 F.2d 705, 708 (10th Cir.
1985) and Crystal Grower's Corp. v. Dobbins, 616 F.2d 458, 461 (10th Cir. 1980)).
When possible, only confidential portions of filings with the Court shall be filed under
seal.

13

IX.

OTHER MATTERS
Entering into, agreeing to, and/or producing or receiving designated information

or otherwise complying with the terms of this Order shall not:
A. Operate as an admission by any Receiving Party that any information
designated as “Confidential” and/or “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” contains or reflects
trade secrets or any other type of confidential or proprietary information
entitled to protection under applicable law;
B. Prejudice in any way the rights of any party to object to the production or use
of documents, electronically stored information, and/or things it considers not
subject to discovery, or operate as an admission by any party that the
restrictions and procedures set forth herein constitute adequate protection for
any particular information deemed by any party to be “Confidential” and/or
“Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information;
C. Prejudice in any way the rights of any party to object to the authenticity or
admissibility into evidence of any document, testimony, or evidence subject to
this Order;
D. Prejudice in any way the rights of any party to seek a determination by the
Court whether any discovery material or designated information should be
subject to the terms of this Order;
E. Prejudice in any way the rights of any party to petition the Court for a further
protective order related to any purportedly “Confidential” and/or “Attorneys’
Eyes Only” information;

14

F. Prevent any Designating Party from agreeing to alter or waive the provisions
or protections provided for herein; or
G. Preclude any Party from filing a motion seeking further or different protection
from the Court under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or
from filing a motion with respect to the manner in which confidential
information shall be treated at trial.

Dated: August 28, 2015

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ David E. Sipiora (by Order)
David E. Sipiora
Jeffrey M. Connor
Miranda C. Rogers
Samantha K. Picans
KILPATRICK, TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600
Denver, CO 80202
[phone] – Telephone
[phone] – Facsimile
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Johns Manville
Corporation and Johns Manville

/s/ Daniel J. Lueders
Daniel J. Lueders
Spiro Bereveskos
WOODARD, EMHARDT, MORIARTY
MCNETT & HENRY LLP
111 Monument Circle, Suite 3700
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-5137
[phone] – Telephone
15

[phone] – Facsimile
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
D. Rusty Denton
[e-mail]
BINGHAM GREENEBAUM DOLL LLP
10 West Market Street, Suite 2700
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-4900
[phone] – Telephone
[phone] – Facsimile
Perry L. Glantz
Stinson Leonard Street LLP
6400 S. Fiddlers Green Circle
Suite 1900
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
[phone] – Telephone
[phone] – Facsimile
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Knauf Insulation, Inc.
and Knauf Insulation GmbH
/s/ James R. Sweeney II (by Order)
John R. Maley
James R. Sweeney II
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
11 South Meridian Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
[phone] – Telephone
[phone] – Facsimile
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Walter Johnson

16

Upon approval, this Stipulated Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Court.
Failure to comply with an Order of the Court may result in sanctions for contempt, or as
provided under Rule 16(f), to and including dismissal or default.
Approved and So Ordered.

September 1, 2015
________________________
Date

_____________________________________
R. Brooke Jackson
U.S. District Court Judge

17

EXHIBIT A
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-00531-RBJ

JOHNS MANVILLE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and
JOHNS MANVILLE, a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
KNAUF INSULATION, INC., a Delaware corporation,
WALTER A. JOHNSON, individually,
KNAUF INSULATION GMBH, a German corporation,
Defendants.
AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY PROTECTIVE ORDER
The undersigned acknowledges having been provided with and having read the
“Stipulated Confidentiality Protective Order” in this matter (“Protective Order”).

The

undersigned further agrees he/she (i) is bound under the Protective Order, (ii) will
comply with all of its provisions, and (iii) is subject to the jurisdiction of the Court for all
purposes arising under the Protective Order, including enforcement of its terms.

________________________
Date

___________________________________

TOWNSEND 67468613 1

18