Cocona, Inc. v. SHEEX, Inc.
Filing
6
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PILOT PROGRAM CONSENT FORM. On or before 5/26/2015, parties shall complete and file the Pilot Program Consent Form 5 . Consent Form due by 5/26/2015. Scheduling Conference set for 6/8/2015 02:30 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/17/2015. (emill)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00541-MJW
COCONA, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
SHEEX, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING
DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PILOT PROGRAM CONSENT FORM
Entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
The above-captioned case has been directly assigned to Magistrate Judge
Michael J. Watanabe pursuant to the Pilot Program to Implement the Direct Assignment
of Civil Cases to Full Time Magistrate Judges. The parties are expected to become
familiar with the Pilot Program (see Docket No. 5).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall FORTHWITH serve the defendant.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before May 26, 2015, 2015, the parties
shall complete and file the Pilot Program Consent Form (see Docket No. 5),
indicating either unanimous consent of the parties or that consent has been
declined. Please note that this date may be earlier than the default deadlines
contemplated by the Pilot Program.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Scheduling/Planning Conference pursuant to
Fed.R.Civ.P.16(b) shall be held on:
June 8, 2015, at 2:30 p.m.
in Courtroom A-502,
Fifth Floor,
Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse,
901 19th Street,
Denver, Colorado 80294
If this date is not convenient for any counsel/pro se party, he/she should confer
with opposing counsel/pro se party and file a motion to reschedule the conference to a
more convenient date. Absent exceptional circumstances, no request for rescheduling
any appearance in this court will be entertained unless a motion is filed no less than
FIVE (5) business days in advance of the date of appearance.
THE PLAINTIFF SHALL NOTIFY ALL PARTIES WHO HAVE NOT ENTERED
AN APPEARANCE OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE SCHEDULING/PLANNING
CONFERENCE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall hold a pre-scheduling conference
meeting and prepare a proposed Patent Scheduling Order in accordance with Fed. R.
Civ. P. 26(f), D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 and 26.1(a),, and D.C.COLO.LPtR 2 on or before
21 days prior to scheduling conference. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d) no discovery
shall be sought until after the pre-scheduling conference meeting. No later than five (5)
business days prior to the Scheduling/Planning Conference, counsel shall file their
proposed Patent Scheduling Order (in PDF) in compliance with the ECF Filing
Procedures. In addition, on or before fourteen (14) days after the pre-scheduling
conference meeting, the parties shall comply with the mandatory disclosure
requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1).
All out-of-state counsel shall comply with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3(a) prior to the
Scheduling/Planning Conference. It is the responsibility of counsel to notice the court of
their entry of appearance, notice of withdrawal, or notice of change of counsel’s
address, e-mail address, or telephone number by complying with the ECF Procedures
and filing the appropriate motion or document with the court.
Please remember that everyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United
States Courthouse will be required to show valid photo identification and be subject to
security procedures. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2. Failure to comply with the
identification requirement and security procedures will result in denial of entry into the
Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse.
DONE AND SIGNED THIS 17th DAY OF MARCH, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/Michael J. Watanabe
_____________________________
MICHAEL J. WATANABE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?