Musclepharm Corporation v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
MINUTE ORDER Denying as MOOT 59 Litigation Pending the Court's Decisions on Pending Summary Judgment Motions and Request for Expedited ConsiderationThereof. (cmira)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00555-REB-KMT
LIBERTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, INC.,
The matter is before the court sua sponte. This case is scheduled to commence a
five-day jury trial on April 25, 2016. However, due to a conflict on the court’s calendar, the
matter cannot proceed to trial at that time.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the combined Final Pretrial Conference/Trial Preparation Conference set
April 8, 2016, is vacated and continued pending further order;
2. That the jury trial set to commence April 25, 2016, is vacated and continued
pending further order;
3. That defendant’s Motion To Stay Litigation Pending the Court’s Decisions
on Pending Summary Judgment Motions and Request for Expedited Consideration
Thereof [#59],2 filed March 18, 2016, is denied as moot;
4. That on April 5, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. (MDT), the court shall conduct a telephonic
(non-appearance) setting conference to reset the combined Final Pretrial Conference/Trial
Preparation Conference and the trial; and
5. That counsel for the plaintiff shall arrange, initiate, and coordinate the conference
call to chambers at 303-335-2350 to facilitate the setting conference.
Dated: March 21, 2016
This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. Blackburn,
United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.
“[#59]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?