Arakji v. Martinez et al
Filing
58
MINUTE ORDER; Plaintiff's Motion for Compelling Defendant City and County of Broomfield to Produce Names and Addresses of Police Officers 45 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Clarification of Dead line to File Responsive Pleading 55 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Compelling Defendant City and County of Broomfield for Initial Disclosure of True Names of Officers John Doe 19 and John Doe 4 56 is DENIED AS MOOT, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/22/15.(morti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00681-CMA-MJW
MAZEN ARAKJI,
Plaintiff,
v.
MARTINEZ,
BECKER,
BREWER,
FAYLES,
LEASE,
LINGLE,
SORRELLES,
AUSTIN,
JOHN DOES 1 - 19, and
BROOMFIELD CITY AND COUNTY,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that:
•
Plaintiff’s Motion for Compelling Defendant City and County of Broomfield
to Produce Names and Addresses of Police Officers (Docket No. 45) is
GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. More specifically:
•
The parties shall exchange their Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures on
or before Friday, May 29, 2015.
•
Defendants’ initial disclosures shall include the names of all John
Does who can be identified based on the allegations in the
Amended Complaint and other information available to Defendants.
•
Defendants’ initial disclosures shall also include either (1) a work
address or agent upon which service for those John Does can be
effected, or (2) an agreement to waive service once a second
amended complaint naming those John Does has been filed.
•
Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Clarification of Deadline to File
Responsive Pleading (Docket No. 55) is GRANTED. More specifically:
•
•
•
It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant City & County of Broomfield
shall file an answer or other response to Plaintiff’s Amended
Complaint (Docket No. 44) on or before June 26, 2015.
Noting that Plaintiff intends to move for leave to file a second
amended complaint identifying further John Doe defendants, it is
further ORDERED that--should Plaintiff do so--Defendant City &
County of Broomfield shall file an answer or other response to such
second amended complaint by the later of June 26, 2015, or 21
days after the second amended complaint is accepted for filing.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Compelling Defendant City and County of Broomfield
for Initial Disclosure of True Names of Officers John Doe 19 and John Doe
4 (Docket No. 56) is DENIED AS MOOT. The relief Plaintiff seeks shall
be provided by Defendant pursuant to the Court’s order, above, on
Plaintiff’s earlier motion to compel initial disclosures (Docket No. 45).
Date: May 22, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?