Shabazz v. Pinnacle Credit Services LLC

Filing 52

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 03/11/16. Telephonic Discovery Conference set for 3/16/2016 03:00 PM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00687-WJM-NYW
LEONA SHABAZZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
PINNACLE CREDIT SERVICES, LLC,
a Minnesota limited liability company,
Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
This matter is before the court pursuant to the Parties’ telephonic request for an informal
telephonic discovery conference (“Discovery Conference”). The subject matter of this
conference will be a discovery dispute that counsel represent has arisen.
IT IS ORDERED that a Discovery Conference is set for March 16, 2016 at 3:00 p.m.:
1. Counsel shall initiate a phone call between themselves prior to calling the Chambers at
[phone] at the designated time;
2. Counsel shall submit to Chambers any written materials which they wish to discuss at the
Discovery Conference;
3. To the extent any of the disputes involve written discovery, the Parties shall complete and
submit the written discovery dispute chart in the following example form, with the most
persuasive authority included:
Issue
Interrogatory No. 1

Moving Party’s Position
Overly
broad
contention
interrogatory.
Witt v. GC
Servs. Ltd. Partnership, 307
F.R.D. 551, 561-562 (D. Colo.
2014).

Opposing Party’s Position
Contention interrogatory is the
appropriate vehicle and is less
burdensome than a Rule
30(b)(6) deposition on this
topic. Teashot LLC v. Green

Mountain Coffee Roasters,
Inc., No. 12-cv-0189-WJMKLM, 2014 WL 485876, at *7
(D. Colo. Feb. 6, 2014).
4. Finally, Counsel shall submit the chart and any written materials
[e-mail] on or before March 15, 2016 at 12:00 p.m.

DATED: March 11, 2016

to