Hooton et al v. Wood et al

Filing 46

MINUTE ORDER granting 44 Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/02/2016. Discovery due by 10/14/2016. Dispositive Motions due by 11/16/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/11/2016 is VACATED and RESET to 2/15/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. (slibi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-00710-LTB-MJW THOMAS HOOTON and JENNIFER HOOTON, Husband and Wife, and CYCLONE ENTERPRISES, INC. d/b/a Kilthau Transports, Plaintiff, v. NAOMI WOOD, individually, SEAN WOOD, individually, NAOMI I. WOOD TRUST DATED FEBURARY [sic] 18, 2010, JOHN JOHNSON, individually, JOHN DOE NO. 1, whose true name is unknown, and JOHN DOE NO. 2., whose true name is unknown, and [sic] Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (Docket No. 44) is granted. The Scheduling Order is amended to extend the following deadlines: the affirmative expert witness deadline is extended to August 16, 2016; the rebuttal expert witness deadline is extended to September 16, 2016; the discovery cutoff is extended to October 14, 2016; and the dispositive motions deadline is extended to November 16, 2016. It is further ORDERED that the August 11, 2016 Final Pretrial Conference set on the calendar of Judge Lewis T. Babcock is VACATED and RESET to February 15, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. on the calendar of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. The Final Pretrial Conference will be held before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe in courtroom A502 of the Alfred A. Arraj Courthouse. It is further ORDERED that the proposed Final Pretrial Order shall be filed on or before February 8, 2017. Date: February 2, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?