Doumbia v. Exempla Lutheran Hospital
Filing
5
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/14/15. (dkals, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-0717-LTB
FATOUMAIA DOUMBIA,
Plaintiff,
v.
EXEMPLA LUTHERAN HOSPITAL,
Defendant.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff, Fatoumaia Doumbia, currently resides in Boulder, Colorado. Plaintiff
filed an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (ECF
No. 3) and a Complaint. In an order entered on April 7, 2015, District Judge Lewis T.
Babcock denied Plaintiff’s Application and advised him that he was required to pay the
$400.00 filing fee within thirty days if he wished to pursue this action (ECF No. 4). In
that Order, Judge Babcock warned Plaintiff that the action would be dismissed without
further notice if he failed to pay the filing fee within thirty days. Plaintiff has failed to pay
the required filing fee. Therefore, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.
The Court also certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from
this Order is not taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied
for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If
Plaintiff files a notice of appeal he must also pay the full $505 appellate filing fee or file a
motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance
with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to cure the deficiencies and for failure to
prosecute. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is
denied.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 14th day of
May , 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?