Watson v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc., et al
Filing
47
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/25/15. The Order is Show Cause 43 is DISCHARGED. Counsel is specifically advised that they must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of Civil Practice, and all orders of this court. Failure to do so in the future may result in the sua sponte striking of filings and/or other sanctions, including dismissal if warranted. (bsimm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00774-NYW
DENNIS WATSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
UPS GROUND FREIGHT, INC.,
ROBERT MANGIONE,
JOHN GONZALES,
KENNETH THOMAS,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
On November 12, 2015, this court issued an Order to Show Cause on or before
November 19, 2015 why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.1
for lack of prosecution [#43]. Plaintiff responded to the Order to Show Cause on November 19,
2015 [#46]. In Plaintiff’s Response, counsel for Plaintiff indicated that they inadvertently failed
to attend the Scheduling Conference in this matter due to “scheduling errors and procedural
misunderstandings.” [Id. at 1].
Plaintiff has demonstrated his intention to pursue this litigation and represented that the
scheduling errors have been rectified. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
(1)
The Order is Show Cause [#43] is DISCHARGED.
Counsel for Plaintiff is specifically advised that they must comply with the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of Civil Practice, and all orders of this court. Failure to do so
in the future may result in the sua sponte striking of filings and/or other sanctions, including
dismissal if warranted.
DATED: November 25, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/Nina Y. Wang___ _______
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?