Saunders v. Krohn et al

Filing 39

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 38 Report and Recommendations and granting 21 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. 1 Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment shall enter in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 3/7/2016. (cpear)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00805-RM-CBS
JONATHAN P. SAUNDERS,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on the February 16, 2016 Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer (the “Recommendation”) (ECF No. 38) to grant
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21). The Recommendation is incorporated herein by
reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).
The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within
fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (ECF No. 38 at 6-7.)
Despite this advisement, no objections to the Recommendation have to date been filed by any
party and the time to do so has expired. (See generally Dkt.)
The Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Shaffer’s analysis was thorough and sound,
and that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) advisory
committee’s note (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there
is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”); see also
Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (“In the absence of timely objection, the

district court may review a magistrate’s report under any standard it deems appropriate.”). The
Recommendation is, therefore, adopted as an order of this Court.
In accordance with the foregoing, the Court:
(1)

ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation of United States Magistrate (ECF No.
38) in its entirety;

(2)

GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21);

(3)

DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff’s Complaint; and

(4)

DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against
Plaintiff.
DATED this 7th day of March, 2016.
BY THE COURT:

____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge

2