Walker v. Scherbarth et al
Filing
29
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe: Scheduling Conference held on 8/27/2015, time utilized as a status conference. Granting 28 Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery and Stay any Rule 26 Deadlines and Proceedings. This case is STAYED. Plaintiff's Oral Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to 23 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted up to and including 9/14/2015. Court Reporter: FTR - E. E. Miller. FTR: Courtroom A502. (emill)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
Civil Action No.
Date:
15-cv-00823-MJW
FTR - Courtroom A-502
Courtroom Deputy, Ellen E. Miller
August 27, 2015
Counsel
Parties
TYRONE WALKER,
#97763
Pro Se
(by telephone)
Plaintiff(s),
v.
DAVID SCHERBARTH,
In Individual and Official Capacities,
WESLEY WILSON,
In Individual and Official Capacities,
FRANKIE NICKELS,
In Individual and Official Capacities,
VIRGINIA PAGE,
In Individual and Official Capacities,
FELICIA BROOKS,
In Individual and Official Capacities,
JEAN PETERSON,
In Individual and Official Capacities,
RAMONA PHIPPS,
In Individual and Official Capacities,
BRIAN UHRICH,
In Individual and Official Capacities,
ALLEN HARMS, In Individual and Official Capacities,
CURTIS DEINES,
In Individual and Official Capacities,
D. HILLYER, In Individual and Official Capacities,
FITZGERALD, In Individual and Official Capacities,
HIGGINS, In Individual and Official Capacities,
KEVIN VORWALD,
In Individual and Official Capacities, and
MARC BOLT, In Individual and Official Capacities,
Molly A. Moats
Defendant(s).
COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER
HEARING:
RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Court in Session:
9:02 a.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of Pro Se plaintiff and defense counsel. Ms. Moats appears for
all defendants except defendant FRANKIE NICKELS.
This is the time set for a Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. In light of the Motion to Stay
Discovery filed by Defendants, this time is utilized as a Status Conference. No deadlines or
conferences are set at this time.
The Court raises Defendants’ Motion to Stay for discussion. Plaintiff advises the Court he has
received a copy of the motion and has no objection to the stay.
It is ORDERED:
Defendants’ MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND STAY ANY RULE 26
DEADLINES AND PROCEEDINGS [Docket No. 28, filed August 24, 2015
is GRANTED.
This case, including all discovery, all Rule 26 deadlines, and all
proceedings, is STAYED until further order of the Court and/or
until a ruling is entered on the Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss [Docket No. 23, filed August 10, 2015].
Plaintiff makes an Oral Motion for an Extension of Time to file his Response to the Motion to
Dismiss [Docket No. 23]. With no objection by the Defendants,
It is ORDERED:
Plaintiff’s Oral Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED,
Plaintiff shall have up to and including SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 within
which to file his Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Docket No.
23, filed August 10, 2015].
Hearing concluded.
Court in recess: 9:07 a.m.
Total In-Court Time 00: 05
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?