Apodaca et al v. Raemisch et al
ORDER denying 61 Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification. Defendants' Motion To Stay All Proceedings 80 is granted. All pending deadlines are vacated. This matter is stayed pending further order of the court. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/30/2015.(mlace, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00845-REB-MJW
JONATHAN APODACA, and
JOSHUA VIGIL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, in his
individual capacity, and
TRAVIS TRANI, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, in his individual capacity,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY
The matter before me is defendants’ Motion To Stay All Proceedings [#80],1 filed
November 27, 2015. This court’s decision denying defendants’ motion to dismiss
implicates their putative entitlement to qualified immunity, and thus is a final decision
properly appealable. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 672, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1946,
173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009). The defendants have filed a Notice of Appeal [#77]. A stay of
proceedings therefore is appropriate, as this court now lacks jurisdiction over the matter.
Stewart v. Donges, 915 F.2d 572, 575 (10th Cir. 1990).
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That defendants’ Motion To Stay All Proceedings [#80], filed November 27,
“[#80]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
2015, is granted;
2. That all pending deadlines are vacated;
3. That Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification [#61], filed September 3, 2015,
is denied without prejudice; and
4. That this matter is stayed pending further order of the court.
Dated November 30, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?