Anderson v. Miller et al

Filing 29

ORDER granting 28 Motion to Address Applicant's Issues. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court mail to Applicant, together with a copy of this Order, a copy of the Courts Order to Dismiss in Part 22 and the Answer 23 filed by Respondents, by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/01/2015.(cthom, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 15-cv-905-WJM JAMES ANDERSON, Applicant, v. MILLER, and CYNTHIA COFFMAN, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Respondents. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the pro se “Motion to Address Issues & Respond to 11-18, 15 Order” (ECF No. 28) filed November 25, 2015, by Applicant, James Anderson. Although not entirely clear, Mr. Anderson apparently alleges in the motion that he has not received a copy of the Court’s Order to Dismiss in Part (ECF No. 22) entered in this action on September 23, 2015, or a copy of the Answer (ECF No. 23) filed by Respondents on October 22, 2015. The Court construes the motion liberally as a motion for copies of those documents. So construed, the motion will be granted. Applicant shall continue to have up to and including January 7, 2016, to file a traverse. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the “Motion to Address Issues & Respond to 11-18, 15 Order” (ECF No. 28), which the Court has construed as a request for copies of the Court’s Order to Dismiss in Part (ECF No. 22) and the Answer (ECF No. 23) filed by Respondents, is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court mail to Applicant, together with a copy of this Order, a copy of the Court’s Order to Dismiss in Part (ECF No. 22) and the Answer (ECF No. 23) filed by Respondents. Dated this 1st day of December, 2015. BY THE COURT: __________________________ William J. Martínez United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?