Arndt et al v. City of Colorado Springs

Filing 45

COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held before Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/22/2015. Denying 27 Human Performance Systems, Inc.'s Motion to Quash and/or Modify Subpoena. Parties shall proceed in accordance with the procedure Ms. Dell' Olio outlined. The information will be provided for attorneys' eyes only and will be coded. Denying 39 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, as no brief is required. Def endant has up to and including 11/9/2015 to submit its expert report. Defendant's Oral Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited Discovery is denied. Preliminary Injunction Hearing is set for 11/23/2015 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom A before Judge Richard P. Matsch regarding motion 35 . Counsel shall be present at 8:30 AM. FTR: D. Hansen. (ebuch)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
Courtroom Deputy:
FTR Technician:

October 22, 2015
Emily Buchanan
Deborah Hansen

Civil Action No. 15-cv-00922-RPM

Counsel:

REBECCA ARNDT,
NICOLE BALDWIN,
CATHY BUCKLEY,
STACEY CLARK,
DONYA DAVIS,
JULIE GARRETT,
CAROLYN GRAVES,
SAMANTHA LEMBERGS,
JENNIFER LEWIS,
GERALDINE PRING,
MAGDALENA SANTOS, and
TERRY THRUMSTON,

Donna Dell'Olio
Ian Kalmanowitz

Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS,

David Powell
Stephen Rotter

Defendant.

COURTROOM MINUTES

MOTION HEARING on Human Performance Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Quash and/or
Modify Subpoena
9:28 a.m.

Court in session.

Marilyn Doig for movant Human Performance Systems, Inc. is present.
9:30 a.m.

Ms. Dell'Olio answers Court’s questions regarding depositions, the subpoena
issued to Human Performance Systems, Inc., the officers’ names, and coding the
performance information.

9:36 a.m.

Ms. Doig answers Court’s questions regarding the protective order and coding the
officers’ performance information.

ORDERED: Human Performance Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Quash and/or Modify Subpoena
(Doc. No. 27) is DENIED. Parties shall proceed in accordance with the
procedure Ms. Dell’Olio outlined. The information will be provided for
attorneys’ eyes only and will be coded.
9:39 a.m.

Ms. Dell'Olio answers Court’s questions regarding the amended complaint,
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and the status of plaintiffs and the
P.A.T. test.

9:44 a.m.

Mr. Powell answers Court’s questions regarding plaintiffs’ P.A.T. test and setting
a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 39) is DENIED, as no brief is required.
Defendant has up to and including November 9, 2015 to submit its expert
report.
ORDERED: Defendant’s Oral Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited Discovery is DENIED.
Defendant does not need to depose plaintiffs’ experts, but may cross examine
them in court.
ORDERED: A Preliminary Injunction Hearing is set for November 23, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.
regarding Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 35). Counsel
shall be present at 8:30 a.m.
9:50 a.m.

Court in recess.

Hearing concluded. Total time:

22 minutes.

2