Muragara v. Moneygram Payment System International

Filing 41

MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 27 Motion to Dismiss, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/13/2015.(slibi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-00939-MEH JECKONIAS N. MURAGARA, Plaintiff, v. MONEYGRAM PAYMENT SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 13, 2015. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint [docket #40], properly filed as a matter of course pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). In light of this filing, Defendant’s recently filed Motion to Dismiss [filed October 27, 2015; docket #27] is denied as moot with leave to re-file, if Defendant so chooses, in response to the Amended Complaint. See Franklin v. Kansas Dep’t of Corr., 160 F. App’x 730, 734 (10th Cir. 2005) (“An amended complaint supersedes the original complaint and renders the original complaint of no legal effect.”) (citing Miller v. Glanz, 948 F. 2d 1562, 1565 (10th Cir. 1991)); see also Robinson v. Dean Foods Co., No. 08-cv-01186-REB-CBS, 2009 WL 723329, at *4 (D. Colo. Mar. 18, 2009) (citation omitted) (“Generally, when an amended complaint is filed, the previous complaint is wiped out and the operative complaint is the most recently filed version.”).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?