Magnum et al v. Raemisch et al

Filing 15

JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 14 Order of Dismissal. (jgonz, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-01050-LTB MARK ANTHONY MAGNUM, individually as a prisoner under the control and custody and care of the Defendants, Plaintiff, v. RICK RAEMISCH, In his Official Capacity as the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, an Employee of the State of Colorado, BRANDON C. SHAFFER, In his Official Capacity as Chairman of the Colorado State Board of Parole, an Employee for the State of Colorado, JOHN DOE #1, In his Individual Capacity, John Doe #1 in his or her Official and Individual Capacity as a Colorado State Board of Parole, Administrative Hearing Officer or Administrative Law Judge, an Employee of the State of Colorado, MATTHEW GOLDBERG, In his Official and Individual Capacity as Colorado Department of Corrections Parole Officer, an Employee of the Colorado Department of Corrections, KRISTIN WATT, In her Official and Individual Capacity as a Colorado Department of Corrections Parole Officer, an Employee of the Colorado Department of Corrections, JOHN DOE #2, In his Official and Individual Capacity as a Colorado Department of Corrections Parole Officer, an Employee of the Colorado Department of Corrections, JOHN DOE #3, In his Official and Individual Capacity as a Colorado Department of Corrections Parole Officer, and Employee of the Colorado Department of Corrections, Defendants. JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with the Order of Dismissal entered by Lewis T. Babcock, Senior District Judge, on July 29, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 29 day of July, 2015. FOR THE COURT, JEFFREY P. COLWELL, Clerk By: s/ A. GarcĂ­a Gallegos Deputy Clerk 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?