Magnum et al v. Raemisch et al
Filing
15
JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 14 Order of Dismissal. (jgonz, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01050-LTB
MARK ANTHONY MAGNUM, individually as a prisoner under the control and custody
and care of the Defendants,
Plaintiff,
v.
RICK RAEMISCH, In his Official Capacity as the Executive Director of the Colorado
Department of Corrections, an Employee of the State of Colorado,
BRANDON C. SHAFFER, In his Official Capacity as Chairman of the Colorado State
Board of Parole, an Employee for the State of Colorado,
JOHN DOE #1, In his Individual Capacity, John Doe #1 in his or her Official
and Individual Capacity as a Colorado State Board of Parole, Administrative
Hearing Officer or Administrative Law Judge, an Employee of the State of
Colorado,
MATTHEW GOLDBERG, In his Official and Individual Capacity as Colorado
Department of Corrections Parole Officer, an Employee of the Colorado
Department of Corrections,
KRISTIN WATT, In her Official and Individual Capacity as a Colorado Department of
Corrections Parole Officer, an Employee of the Colorado Department of
Corrections,
JOHN DOE #2, In his Official and Individual Capacity as a Colorado Department of
Corrections Parole Officer, an Employee of the Colorado Department of
Corrections,
JOHN DOE #3, In his Official and Individual Capacity as a Colorado Department of
Corrections Parole Officer, and Employee of the Colorado Department of
Corrections,
Defendants.
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to and in accordance with the Order of Dismissal entered by Lewis T.
Babcock, Senior District Judge, on July 29, 2015, it is hereby
ORDERED that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 29 day of July, 2015.
FOR THE COURT,
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, Clerk
By: s/ A. GarcĂa Gallegos
Deputy Clerk
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?