Schumacher v. Colvin
Filing
21
ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the parties Stipulation for Equal Access to Justice Act Attorney Fees ECF No. 20 . Upon stipulation by the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $3,505.68 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/20/2015.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01067-WYD
SHERRY L. SCHUMACHER,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the parties Stipulation for Equal
Access to Justice Act Attorney Fees (ECF No. 20). Upon stipulation by the parties, it is
hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $3,505.68 in attorney fees under the Equal
Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. ยง 2412. It is further ordered that if, after receiving the
Court's EAJA fee order, the Commissioner (1) determines that Plaintiff has assigned the
EAJA fees to his attorney, (2) determines upon effectuation of the Court's EAJA fee
order that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury
Offset Program, and (3) agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act,
the fees will be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney. However, if there is a debt owned
under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the
requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining EAJA fees after offset will
be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff's attorney and delivered
to:
Sherry L. Schumacher
c/o Teresa Abbott, Esq.
Law Office of Teresa Abbott, P.C.
10200 E. Girard Avenue, Suite D140
Denver CO 80231
Dated: November 20, 2015
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
WILEY Y. DANIEL,
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?