Schumacher v. Colvin

Filing 21

ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the parties Stipulation for Equal Access to Justice Act Attorney Fees ECF No. 20 . Upon stipulation by the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $3,505.68 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/20/2015.(evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 15-cv-01067-WYD SHERRY L. SCHUMACHER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the parties Stipulation for Equal Access to Justice Act Attorney Fees (ECF No. 20). Upon stipulation by the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $3,505.68 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. ยง 2412. It is further ordered that if, after receiving the Court's EAJA fee order, the Commissioner (1) determines that Plaintiff has assigned the EAJA fees to his attorney, (2) determines upon effectuation of the Court's EAJA fee order that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, and (3) agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, the fees will be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney. However, if there is a debt owned under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff's attorney and delivered to: Sherry L. Schumacher c/o Teresa Abbott, Esq. Law Office of Teresa Abbott, P.C. 10200 E. Girard Avenue, Suite D140 Denver CO 80231 Dated: November 20, 2015 BY THE COURT: /s/ Wiley Y. Daniel WILEY Y. DANIEL, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?