USA v. 2006 Audi A4, VIN: WAUAF78E66A165756
Filing
8
ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss. This case is DISMISSED in its entirety, without prejudice. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 07/08/2015. (athom, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Christine M. Arguello
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01076-CMA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
2006 AUDI A4, VIN: WAUAF78E66A165756,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER OF DISMISSMAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
_____________________________________________________________________
This matter comes before the Court on the United States of America’s Motion for
Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice (Doc. # 7). The United States of America seeks
to dismiss the instant action without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court, having reviewed the instant Motion, FINDS:
THAT the United States of America filed its Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In
Rem, pursuant to the civil forfeiture provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 881.
THAT the Court issued an Order for Warrant for Arrest of Property In Rem for the
defendant property as well as a Warrant for Arrest of Property In Rem. (Doc. ## 4, 5.)
The United States also issued notice that any persons claiming or asserting an interest
in the above-described property must file a Claim pursuant to Supplemental Rule G(5)
with the Clerk of the United States District Court. (Doc. # 6.) However, no interested
1
person claiming or asserting an interest in the above-described property has filed a
claim or any other responsive pleading in this case.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the United States of America’s Motion for
Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. # 7) is GRANTED, and that this case is DISMISSED in its
entirety, without prejudice.
DATED: July 8, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
______________________________
United States District Court
Judge/Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?