Scott v. USA
Filing
36
ORDER OF REFERENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) re: 35 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge, filed by Bernadine Scott. This action is referred for disposition to the magistrate judge currently assigned to the case. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/8/2015. (mlace, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01091-REB-CBS
BERNADINE SCOTT,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE UNITED STATES individually and/or d/b/a UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, and
SNOWGO NATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC, a Limited Liability Company with jurisdiction in
Delaware,
Defendants.
ORDER OF REFERENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)
Blackburn, J.
Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2, I received a Consent Form Pursuant to Pilot
Program To Implement the Direct Assignment of Civil Cases to Full Time Magistrate
Judges [#35],1 filed December 8, 2015. The parties have consented in the time and
manner specified by statute and local rule to disposition of the above action by a United
States Magistrate Judge.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), this action is
referred for disposition to the magistrate judge currently assigned to the case.
Dated December 8, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
1
“[#35]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?