Hamilton v. Boyd

Filing 57

MINUTE ORDER denying 50 Motion to Appoint Investigator; denying 51 Motion for Summons; denying 52 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; AND denying 53 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff must file an Amended Complaint pursuant to 47 Order to File Amended Complaint, by September 8, 2015, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 08/13/15.(nmarb, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01107-CBS
JAN B. HAMILTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES B. BOYD, Judge, et al.,
Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CRAIG B. SHAFFER
On August 6, 2015, the Court directed Ms. Hamilton to file an Amended
Complaint within 30 days. (ECF No. 47). Ms. Hamilton has now filed a Motion to
Appoint Investigator (ECF No. 50), a Motion for Summons to be Made (ECF No. 51), a
Motion for Court Appointed Attorney (ECF No. 52), and a “Motion to Reconsider
Contempt of Court on Jeff Fain and Don Bird & Sara Roush” (ECF No. 53). The
motions are all DENIED for the reasons discussed in previous court orders.
Ms. Hamilton is advised again that this case is in preliminary review proceedings.
See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(b) and (c). The Court will not reconsider appointing counsel
in this action or serve any Defendants unless and until some or all of this case is drawn
to a presiding judge, following review of the Amended Complaint Ms. Hamilton must file
by September 8, 2015.
Ms. Hamilton is warned that if she fails to file an Amended Complaint in
compliance with the August 6 Order by the court-ordered deadline, or demonstrate good
cause for an extension of that deadline, this action will be dismissed without further
notice.
Dated: August 13, 2015