Hamilton v. Boyd

Filing 63

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 61 Motion to Clarify by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 08/24/15.(nmarb, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-01107-CBS JAN B. HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. JAMES B. BOYD, Judge, et al., Defendant. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CRAIG B. SHAFFER On August 20, 2015, Ms. Hamilton filed a “Petition of Clarification” (ECF No. 61). The Petition is granted, in part, as follows, and is otherwise denied. Plaintiff has not been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this action because she paid the $400.00 filing fee on July 6, 2015. The Court denied her IFP motions as moot on July 20, 2015 (see ECF No. 27). To the extent Plaintiff believes that she is being denied her constitutional right of access to the Courts, she should include the claim in her Amended Application, which is due on September 8, 2015 (see ECF No. 47). Plaintiff’s current pending cases are as follows: 15-cv-01107-CBS: 15-cv-01691-GPG: 15-cv-01791-GPG: 15-cv-01792-GPG: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action (civil rights) 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (habeas) 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (habeas) 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (habeas) Ms. Hamilton is reminded that any document she files with this Court must include the correct Civil Action Number at the top of the pleading. Dated: August 24, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?