Hamilton v. Boyd
Filing
63
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 61 Motion to Clarify by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 08/24/15.(nmarb, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01107-CBS
JAN B. HAMILTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES B. BOYD, Judge, et al.,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CRAIG B. SHAFFER
On August 20, 2015, Ms. Hamilton filed a “Petition of Clarification” (ECF No. 61).
The Petition is granted, in part, as follows, and is otherwise denied. Plaintiff has not
been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this action because she paid the
$400.00 filing fee on July 6, 2015. The Court denied her IFP motions as moot on July
20, 2015 (see ECF No. 27). To the extent Plaintiff believes that she is being denied her
constitutional right of access to the Courts, she should include the claim in her
Amended Application, which is due on September 8, 2015 (see ECF No. 47). Plaintiff’s
current pending cases are as follows:
15-cv-01107-CBS:
15-cv-01691-GPG:
15-cv-01791-GPG:
15-cv-01792-GPG:
42 U.S.C. § 1983 action (civil rights)
28 U.S.C. § 2254 (habeas)
28 U.S.C. § 2254 (habeas)
28 U.S.C. § 2254 (habeas)
Ms. Hamilton is reminded that any document she files with this Court must
include the correct Civil Action Number at the top of the pleading.
Dated: August 24, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?