Slawson Exploration Company, Inc. v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company

Filing 97

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/29/16. Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Briefing # 94 is GRANTED. Unopposed Motion for Permission to File Reply Briefing Out of Time # 95 and Unopposed Motion for Permission to File Reply Briefing Out of Time # 96 are DENIED as moot.(lgale, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01131-KLM
SLAWSON EXPLORATION COMPANY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension
of Time to File Reply Briefing [#94] (“Motion to Extend”) and Unopposed Motion for
Permission to File Reply Briefing Out of Time [#95], as well as Plaintiff’s Unopposed
Motion for Permission to File Reply Briefing Out of Time [#96] (collectively, “Motions
to File Briefing Out of Time”). On March 24, 2016, Defendant filed its Motion to Extend
requesting that the Court extend the deadlines for the parties to file reply briefing in support
of the threshold motions1 from March 25, 2016 to April 1, 2016 due to inclement weather
and power outages. Motion to Extend [#94] at 1-2. The parties have also filed Motions to
File Briefing Out of Time, to which each attaches its respective reply briefing in further
support of the motions. Motions to File Briefing Out of Time [#95, #96]. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Extend [#94] is GRANTED. The
deadline by which the parties must file their respective Replies is hereby extended to April
1, 2016.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that parties’ Motions to File Briefing Out of Time [#95,
#96] are DENIED as moot.
Dated: March 29, 2016

1

The “threshold motions” referenced by counsel are: two Rule 56 motions [#55, #60] filed
by both parties, and Defendant’s Motion for Determination of Question of Law [#57]. Thus,
Defendant was in the process of preparing two Replies, and Plaintiff was in the process of
preparing one Reply.

1