Curran v. Colvin et al

Filing 21

ORDER granting 20 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Remand, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/20/2015. (ebuch)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01159-REB
CYNTHIA JEAN CURRAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

ORDER FOR REMAND AND JUDGMENT
Blackburn, J.
The matter before me is Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Remand [#20],1
filed October 19, 2015. By this motion, defendant requests that the court remand this
matter for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Having reviewed the motion and the file, I find and conclude that the motion is welltaken and should be granted.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Remand [#20], filed October 19,
2015, is granted,
2. That the conclusion of the Commissioner through the Administrative Law
Judge that plaintiff was not disabled is reversed;
3. That this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative
proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g);
1

“[#20]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.

4. That judgment shall enter in favor of plaintiff against defendant in accordance
with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme
Court in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 2628-32, 125
L.Ed.2d 239 (1993); and
5. That plaintiff is awarded her costs to be taxed by the clerk of the court
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1 and 28 U.S.C.
§ 2412(a)(1).
Dated October 20, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

2