Curran v. Colvin et al

Filing 25

ORDER Granting 23 plaintiffs EAJA Motion for Award of Attorneys Fees, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/16/2015.(evana, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 15-cv-01159-REB CYNTHIA JEAN CURRAN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT Blackburn, J. The matter before me is plaintiff’s EAJA Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees1 [#23],2 filed November 19, 2015. By her response [#24], filed November 25, 2015, the Commissioner indicates that she has no objection to the amount of fees and expenses requested. I therefore grant the motion and award that amount of fees payable to plaintiff. See Manning v. Astrue, 510 F.3d 1246, 1249-55 (10th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 129 S.Ct. 486 (2008). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That plaintiff’s EAJA Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees [#23], filed November 19, 2015, is granted; and 1 2 Improperly designated on the docket as “Social Security Administrative Record.” “[#23]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 2. That pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), plaintiff is awarded attorney fees of $4,025.15. Dated December 16, 2015, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?