Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Doe 1 et al
Filing
29
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs Notice of Dismissal of Case Without Prejudice ECF No. 28 against defendants John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, John Doe 7, John Doe 8, John Doe 9, John Doe 10, John Doe 11, John Doe 12, John Doe 13, John Doe 14, John Doe 15, John Doe 17, John Doe 18, John Doe 19, John Doe 20, John Doe 21, John Doe 22, John Doe 23, John Doe 24 and John Doe 25 terminated. by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/6/2015. (evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 15-cv-1175-WYD-MEH
COBBLER NEVADA, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN DOE 1,
JOHN DOE 2,
JOHN DOE 3,
JOHN DOE 4,
JOHN DOE 5,
JOHN DOE 6,
JOHN DOE 7,
JOHN DOE 8,
JOHN DOE 9
JOHN DOE 10,
JOHN DOE 11,
JOHN DOE 13,
JOHN DOE 14,
JOHN DOE 15,
JOHN DOE 17,
JOHN DOE 18,
JOHN DOE 19,
JOHN DOE 20,
JOHN DOE 21,
JOHN DOE 22,
JOHN DOE 23,
JOHN DOE 24,
JOHN DOE 25,
Defendants.
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Notice of Dismissal of Case
Without Prejudice (ECF No. 28), filed on October 2, 2015. None of the remaining
Defendants have filed an Answer or a Motion for Summary Judgment in this matter.
After careful review of the record, the Court concludes that pursuant to Rule
41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this action shall be DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE against
Defendants 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24,
and 25. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
Dated: October 6, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?