Carstensen v. Colvin

Filing 15

ORDER By December 2, 2015, the parties may sign and file the attached form of consent. That on completion of pre-merits management, the court shall issue an appropriate order of reference directing the clerk of the court to assign this matter to a United States Magistrate Judge. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/2/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Standard 72.2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (mlace, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 15-cv-01207-REB CHRISTINE JO CARSTENSEN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER Blackburn, J. This matter is before the court sua sponte. The parties have indicated their intent under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d) to consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (See Proposed Joint Case Management Plan ¶ 10 [#13], filed November 2, 2015.) To effectuate that consent, the parties must file the form required under Rule 72.2(d), entitled “Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge,” a copy of which is attached to this Order.1 If the parties persist under Rule 72.2(d) in their consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), they should complete and file the consent form attached to this Order. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1 A paradigm of this form also is available on the court’s website under “Rules & Procedures” at “Forms” and then under “Local Rules of Practice Forms.” 1. That by December 2, 2015, the parties may sign and file the attached form of consent; and 2. That on completion of pre-merits management, the court shall issue an appropriate order of reference directing the clerk of the court to assign this matter to a United States Magistrate Judge. Dated November 2, 2015, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?