McClendon v. JBS USA, LLC

Filing 37

MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 22 Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss; granting 32 Motion to Allow Second Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/20/2015.(slibi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-01255-REB-MEH HILTON McCLENDON, JR, Plaintiff, v. JBS USA, LLC., Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on October 20, 2015. Plaintiff’s [Unopposed1] Motion to Allow Second Amended Complaint [filed October 8, 2015; docket #32] is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint [see docket #32-2] as the operative complaint in the case. In light of this order, Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss [filed August 28, 2015; docket #22] is denied as moot with leave to refile in response to the Second Amended Complaint. See Franklin v. Kansas Dep’t of Corrs., 160 F. App’x 730, 734 (10th Cir. 2005) (“An amended complaint supersedes the original complaint and renders the original complaint of no legal effect.”) (citing Miller v. Glanz, 948 F. 2d 1562, 1565 (10th Cir. 1991)); see also Robinson v. Dean Foods Co., No. 08-cv-01186-REB-CBS, 2009 WL 723329, at *4 (D. Colo. Mar. 18, 2009) (citation omitted) (“Generally, when an amended complaint is filed, the previous complaint is wiped out and the operative complaint is the most recently filed version.”). 1 The Court’s Minute Order of October 8, 2015, allowed Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion on or before October 19, 2015. See docket #31. As Defendant did not respond, the Motion is unopposed.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?