Gotham Insurance Company v. Hansen et al
Filing
28
ORDER Granting 26 Agreed Motion to Dismiss Homeowner Defendants Party Sohrab Amini, Vaughan Counts, Michael Cryan, Joseph Davis, Kristin Davis, Gary Gray, Daniel Hock, Toni Hock, David Ice, Lisa Ice, James Vidakovich Revocable Trust, Helen Korn reich, Kurt Kornreich, Kornreich 1981 Trust, The, Charlie Lawson, Saraliz Lawson, Thisha McBride, Chadwick Miskschl, Sarah Miskschl, Stephanie Mosher, Patrick M. Nesbitt, Kori New, Steven New, Andre Pontin, Juline Pontin, Jamie Prough, Martin Roch owiak, Michael Rochowiak, Tina Rochowiak, Neil Ross, Sohrab Amini Trust, The, James Vidakovich, Craig Willis, Pamela Willis, Brian Alonge and J. Christine Amini are dropped as named parties to this action, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/22/2016.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01311-REB-MEH
GOTHAM INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
STEVEN A. HANSEN,
HANSEN CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
VAUGHAN COUNTS,
THISHA McBRIDE,
CHARLIE LAWSON and SARALIZ LAWSON,
STEPHANIE MOSHER,
STEVEN NEW and KORI NEW,
CRAIG WILLIS and PAMELA WILLIS,
THE KORNREICH 1981 TRUST, KURT KORNREICH and HELEN KORNREICH,
JAMES VIDAKOVICH REVOCABLE TRUST and JAMES VIDAKOVICH,
GARY GRAY, MICHAEL CRYAN and BRIAN ALONGE,
ANDRE PONTIN and JULINE PONTIN,
PATRICK M. NESBITT,
DAVID ICE and LISA ICE,
RICHARD MOORE,
DANIEL HOCK and TONI HOCK,
J. CHRISTINE AMINI, NEIL ROSS, SOHRAB AMINI, and THE SOHRAB AMINI
TRUST,
JOSEPH DAVIS and KRISTIN DAVIS,
TINA ROCHOWIAK, MICHAEL ROCHOWIAK, MARTIN ROCHOWIAK, and
JAMIE PROUGH, and
CHADWICK MISKSCHL and SARAH MISKSCHL,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION TO DISMISS HOMEOWNER DEFENDANTS
Blackburn, J.
The matter before me is the parties’ Agreed Motion To Dismiss Homeowner
Defendants [#26],1 filed January 21, 2016. After careful review of the motion and the
file, I conclude the motion should be granted and plaintiff’s claims against the
homeowner defendants dismissed with prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the parties’ Agreed Motion To Dismiss Homeowner Defendants [#26],
filed January 21, 2016, is granted;
2. That plaintiff’s claims against defendants, Vaughan Counts; Thisha McBride;
Charlie Lawson and Saraliz Lawson; Stephanie Mosher; Steven New and Kori New;
Craig Willis and Pamela Willis; the Kornreich 1981 Trust; Kurt Kornreich and Helen
Kornreich; James Vidakovich Revocable Trust and James Vidakovich; Gary Gray;
Michael Cryan and Brian Alonge; Andre Pontin and Juline Pontin; Patrick M. Nesbitt;
David Ice and Lisa Ice; Richard Moore; Daniel Hock and Toni Hock; J. Christine Amini;
Neil Ross; Sohrab Amini and the Sohrab Amini Trust; Joseph Davis and Kristin Davis;
Tina Rochowiak, Michael Rochowiak, Martin Rochowiak, and Jamie Prough; and
Chadwick Miskschl and Sarah Miskschl, are dismissed with prejudice with the affected
parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs;
3. That defendants, Vaughan Counts; Thisha McBride; Charlie Lawson and
Saraliz Lawson; Stephanie Mosher; Steven New and Kori New; Craig Willis and Pamela
Willis; the Kornreich 1981 Trust; Kurt Kornreich and Helen Kornreich; James Vidakovich
Revocable Trust and James Vidakovich; Gary Gray; Michael Cryan and Brian Alonge;
1
“[#26]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
2
Andre Pontin and Juline Pontin; Patrick M. Nesbitt; David Ice and Lisa Ice; Richard
Moore; Daniel Hock and Toni Hock; J. Christine Amini; Neil Ross; Sohrab Amini and the
Sohrab Amini Trust; Joseph Davis and Kristin Davis; Tina Rochowiak, Michael
Rochowiak, Martin Rochowiak, and Jamie Prough; and Chadwick Miskschl and Sarah
Miskschl, are dropped as named parties to this action, and the case caption amended
accordingly.
Dated January 22, 2016, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?