Weatherford International, LLC v. McKeachnie et al

Filing 91

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/8/16 re:# 88 Joint Notice of Settlement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Rule 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Rule 9(b) and 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismi ss for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief May be Granted # 53 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Its Third Amended Complaint # 61 is DENIED as moot. Dismissal Paper due by 5/6/2016.(lgale, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-01320-MSK-KLM WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL , LLC, a Texas corporation, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL MCKEACHNIE, an individual, MARTIN HENLINE, an individual, JONATHAN LONG, an individual, SCOTT WILLIAMSON, an individual, MICHAEL DEDMAN, an individual, CASITY FILLINGIM, an individual, JASON HOUSE, an individual, JOSHUA JOHNSON, an individual, and TROY VAVRA, an individual, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on the Joint Notice of Settlement [#88]. The parties state that “all of the claims and disputes between them in this in action” have been settled. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file dismissal papers on or before May 6, 2016. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Rule 9(b) and 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief May be Granted [#53] is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Its Third Amended Complaint [#61] is DENIED as moot. Dated: April 8, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?