Wyche v. Winston et al
Filing
6
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 8/21/15. (dkals, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01361-GPG
(The above civil action number must appear on all future papers
sent to the court in this action. Failure to include this number
may result in a delay in the consideration of your claims.)
SEGRIC DENARD WYCHE, SR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MR. WINSTON,
MR. P. WALTON,
MS. S. BROWN,
MR. PRICE,
MR. R. THOMAS,
MS. HERLICKSON,
Defendants.
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES
Plaintiff Segric Denard Wyche, Sr., is a prisoner in the custody of the Federal
Bureau of Prisons who currently is incarcerated at FCI Florence in Florence, Colorado.
On June 24, 2015, Plaintiff, acting pro se, initiated this action by filing a Prisoner
Complaint (ECF No. 1) and a Prisoner’s Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915 (ECF No. 2). On July 7, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff
to cure certain designated deficiencies in his submitted documents. (ECF No. 4).
Specifically, the Court noted that Plaintiff’s § 1915 Motion was missing an original
signature by the prisoner, financial information, and authorization to calculate and
disburse filing fee payments. Additionally, the Complaint was missing an original
signature and it included factual allegations but did not state any specific claims.
On August 14, 2015, Plaintiff filed a letter attempting to outline his claims and
also his financial information from the Federal Bureau of Prisons. However, as part of
the Court’s review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(b), the Court has determined that
the submitted documents are also deficient. The letter filed by the Plaintiff was not titled
as a “Complaint” and was not on the current court-approved prisoner complaint form.
Additionally, the Plaintiff failed to submit an amended § 1915 motion with a signature
and an authorization to calculate and disburse filing fee payments. Plaintiff will be given
one last opportunity to cure the following if he wishes to pursue his claims in this Court
in this action. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this Order must include the
civil action number noted above in the caption of this Order.
28 U.S.C. § 1915 Motion and Affidavit:
is not submitted
(1)
(2)
is missing affidavit
(3)
is not on proper form (Must use Court-approved form revised 10-1-12)
(4)
is missing certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement for the 6-month
period immediately preceding this filing
is missing certificate showing current balance in prison account
(5)
(6)
X
is missing authorization to calculate and disburse filing fee payments
(7)
X
is missing an original signature by the prisoner
(8)
other:
Complaint, Petition or Application:
is not submitted
(9)
(10)
X
is not on proper form (must use the Court’s current form)
is missing an original signature by the prisoner
(11)
(12)
is missing page nos.
(13)
uses et al. instead of listing all parties in caption
(14)
names in caption do not match names in text
other:
(15)
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty
days from the date of this Order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this Order
2
must include the civil action number on this Order. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall obtain the Court-approved forms used
in filing a Prisoner Complaint and a Prisoner’s Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (Waive Fees) for a Prisoner Complaint action, along with
the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov, and use the forms to cure the
above noted deficiencies.
FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies
within thirty days from the date of this Order the Complaint and the action will be
dismissed without further notice.
DATED: August 21, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
s/Gordon P. Gallagher
United States Magistrate Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?