Espinoza v. Colvin

Filing 19

ORDER Granting 18 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/15/2016.(cmira)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 15-cv-01369-REB ABEL WAYNE ESPINOZA, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT Blackburn, J. The matter before me is the parties’ Stipulation for Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act [#18],1 filed April 15, 2016. As indicated by the title of the document, the parties have reached agreement as to the amount of attorney fees to be awarded to plaintiff under the Equal Access To Justice Act. After due consideration of the proposed stipulation, I approve it and award attorney fees in the amount stipulated, payable to plaintiff. See Manning v. Astrue, 510 F.3d 1246, 1249-55 (10th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 129 S.Ct. 486 (2008).2 1 “[#18]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 2 In Manning, the Tenth Circuit held the plain language, structure, and history of the EAJA preclude an award of fees to anyone other than the prevailing party. Thus, even if plaintiff has assigned his right to EAJA fees to his attorney, I cannot direct the fee award be paid directly to anyone other than plaintiff himself. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation for Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act [#18], filed April 15, 2016, is approved; and 2. That pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), plaintiff is awarded attorney fees and expenses totaling $2,777.77. Dated April 15, 2016, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?