Petulla v. Capri Colorado Springs, Inc.

Filing 25

ORDER re: 23 Joint MOTION for Order to Refer Case for Settlement Conference and to Stay Discovery and Dispositive Motion Deadline to Facilitate Resolution filed by Capri Colorado Springs, Inc. ORDERED that 23 is GRANTED IN PART as stated in this order and Magistrate Judge Hegarty is authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this case, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 10/27/2015. (cthom, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Raymond P. Moore Civil Action No. 15-cv-01377-RM-MEH NICOLE PETULLA, Plaintiff, v. CAPRI COLORADO SPRINGS, INC., D/B/A HOLIDAY INN COLORADO SPRINGS AIRPORT, Defendant. ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Joint Motion for Order Referring Case for Settlement Conference and to Stay Discovery and the Dispositive Motion Deadline to Facilitate Resolution (ECF No. 23), which contains two requests for relief: (1) a request to refer this action to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty to conduct a settlement conference; and (2) a request to stay discovery and the remaining dispositive motion deadlines. The Court finds good cause to grant the first request and this matter shall be referred to the Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference. The Court finds the second request to stay discovery and the dispositive motion deadline should be referred to the Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Order Referring Case for Settlement Conference and to Stay Discovery and the Dispositive Motion Deadline to Facilitate Resolution (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED IN PART as stated herein. Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty is authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this case. DATED this 27th day of October, 2015. BY THE COURT: ____________________________________ RAYMOND P. MOORE United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?