Mczeal et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
Filing
72
ORDER ADOPTING AUGUST 27, 2015 RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE, DISMISSING ALL PLAINTIFFS, DENYING DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO'S MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT, AND TERMINATING CASE 69 , 63 , by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/15/2015. (dhans, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 15-cv-1381-WJM-MJW
ALFRED MCZEAL,
MARK S. MILLER,
JAMILIEH MILLER,
MATTHEW D. HAYNIE,
NHUT HUY LE,
CHAI MISTY LE, and
LOFTON RYAN BURRIS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
MIDSOUTH BANK, NA,
HREAL COMPANY, LLC,
MIDSOUTH BANK SHARES, INC.,
L. J. ANDELLE,
PHH MORTGAGE,
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA,
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA,
US BANK, National Association as Trustee for Mortgage Pass through Certificates
Series 1998 R3, Mortgage Electronic Registration System,
DEUTSCH BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,
RBS FINANCIAL,
ALTISOURCE,
MACKIE, WOLF, ZIENTZ & MANN, P.C.,
SCHILLER & ADAM, P.A.,
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON, LLP,
MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP,
QUALITY LOAN SERVICES,
DOUGLAS A. TOLENO,
KENDRA WILEY,
SAMUEL R. COLEMAN,
ELLEN B. SILVERMAN, and
JAY L. ANGELLE,
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING AUGUST 27, 2015 RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE
JUDGE, DISMISSING ALL PLAINTIFFS, DENYING DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO’S
MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT, AND TERMINATING CASE
This matter is before the Court on the August 27, 2015 Recommendation of
United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe (the “Recommendation”) (ECF
No. 69) that: (1) Plaintiffs Alfred McZeal, Nhut Huy Le, Chai Misty Le, Lofton Ryan
Burris, and Matthew Haynie be dismissed from this case pursuant to Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure 16(f) (sanctions for failure to appear at a hearing and failure to follow
court orders) and 41(b) (involuntary dismissal for failure to prosecute); and (2) that
Defendants RBS Financial, L. J. Angelle, Altisource, Deutsche Bank National Trust
Company, Douglas A. Tolen, Kendra Wiley, Mackie Wolf Zlentz & Mann, P.C., Ocwen
Loan Servicing, LLC, HREAL Company, LLC, Schiller & Adam, P.A., Midsouth Bank
Shares, Inc., Midsouth Bank, NA, US Bank, Mccarthy & Holthus, LLP, Mortgage
Electronic Registration System, and Quality Loan Services be dismissed for lack of
service under Rule 4(m) and lack of prosecution under Rule 41(b). The
Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were
due within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (ECF
No. 69 at 5–6.) Despite this advisement, no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation have to date been received.
2
The Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s analysis was thorough and
sound, and that there is no clear error on the f ace of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b) advisory committee’s note (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only
satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the
recommendation.”); see also Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991)
(“In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate’s report
under any standard it deems appropriate.”).
Combined with Plaintiffs Mark S. Miller’s and Jamileh Miller’s notice of voluntary
dismissal (ECF No. 63), the effect of the Recommendation is to dismiss all plaintiffs,
and therefore END this lawsuit.
In accordance with the foregoing, the Court ORDERS as follows:
1.
The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (ECF No. 69) is ADOPTED in its
entirety;
2.
Plaintiffs Mark S. Miller’s and Jamileh Miller’s notice of voluntary dismissal (ECF
No. 63) is ACCEPTED;
3.
Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13) is DENIED
AS MOOT; and
4.
The Clerk shall enter final judgment against all Plaintiffs save for Mark S. Miller
and Jamileh Miller in accordance with this Order, and shall terminate this case.
The parties shall bear their own costs.
3
Dated this 15th day of September, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
_________________________
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?