Owens v. Zupan et al
Filing
21
ORDER re: 20 Letter filed by Gregory Owens. ORDERED that the letter to the Court 20 , which the Court has construed liberally as a motion for clarification, is granted, by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/27/2015. (cthom, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Honorable William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01410-WJM
GREGORY OWENS,
Applicant,
v.
DAVID ZUPAN, and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,
Respondents.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the pro se letter to the Court (ECF No. 20)
filed in this action on October 26, 2015, by Applicant, Gregory Owens. Mr. Owens
states in the letter that he is "writing because I am not sure how to proceed or what I
need to do at this point in my case." The Court construes the letter liberally as a motion
for clarification of the Court's Order to Dismiss in Part (ECF No. 19) entered in this
action on October 14, 2015. The motion will be granted.
The Court has dismissed claims two through fifteen in the Amended Application
for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. 6) as unex hausted
and procedurally barred. The Court also has ordered Respondents to f ile an Answer
that addresses the merits of the remaining claim, which is claim one in the Amended
Application. Respondents have not yet filed an Answer, but Mr. Owens will receive a
copy of the Answer when it is filed. Within thirty days after Respondents file their
Answer, Mr. Owens may file a reply, if any, that addresses Respondents' arguments in
their Answer. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the letter to the Court (ECF No. 20), which the Court has
construed liberally as a motion for clarification, is granted.
Dated this 27th day of October, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?