Farrar v. Raemisch et al
Filing
4
ORDER for Initial Response re: 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Charles Farrar. it is ORDERED that on or before August 10, 2015, the Respondents shall file an initial response stating whether any claim is barred by a failure to exhaust state remedies, a procedural bar or a statute of limitations. Certificate of Mailing attached re: Cynthia Coffman, Attorney General, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/8/2015. (evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01425-RPM
CHARLES FARRAR,
Applicant,
v.
RICK RAEMISCH, Exec Director, Colorado Dept of Corrections,
JAMES FALK, Warden, Sterling Correctional Facility, and
CYNTHIA COFFMAN, Attorney General, State of Colorado,
Respondents.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER FOR INITIAL RESPONSE
_____________________________________________________________________
Upon preliminary review of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254, filed on July 6, 2015, and pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules
Governing Section 2254 Cases, it is
ORDERED that on or before August 10, 2015, the Respondents shall file an
initial response stating whether any claim is barred by a failure to exhaust state
remedies, a procedural bar or a statute of limitations.
DATED: July 8, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
__________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I certify that a copy of the foregoing Order for Initial Response was mailed via
U.S. Mail to the following:
Cynthia Coffman
Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Ralph L. Carr Colorado Judicial Center
1300 Broadway, 10th Floor
Denver, CO 80203
DATED: July 8, 2015
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, Clerk
s/M. V. Wentz
By__________________
Deputy
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?