Farrar v. Raemisch et al

Filing 4

ORDER for Initial Response re: 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Charles Farrar. it is ORDERED that on or before August 10, 2015, the Respondents shall file an initial response stating whether any claim is barred by a failure to exhaust state remedies, a procedural bar or a statute of limitations. Certificate of Mailing attached re: Cynthia Coffman, Attorney General, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/8/2015. (evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 15-cv-01425-RPM CHARLES FARRAR, Applicant, v. RICK RAEMISCH, Exec Director, Colorado Dept of Corrections, JAMES FALK, Warden, Sterling Correctional Facility, and CYNTHIA COFFMAN, Attorney General, State of Colorado, Respondents. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER FOR INITIAL RESPONSE _____________________________________________________________________ Upon preliminary review of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254, filed on July 6, 2015, and pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, it is ORDERED that on or before August 10, 2015, the Respondents shall file an initial response stating whether any claim is barred by a failure to exhaust state remedies, a procedural bar or a statute of limitations. DATED: July 8, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch __________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I certify that a copy of the foregoing Order for Initial Response was mailed via U.S. Mail to the following: Cynthia Coffman Attorney General Office of the Attorney General Ralph L. Carr Colorado Judicial Center 1300 Broadway, 10th Floor Denver, CO 80203 DATED: July 8, 2015 JEFFREY P. COLWELL, Clerk s/M. V. Wentz By__________________ Deputy 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?