Strepka v. Alba et al

Filing 33

MINUTE ORDER; 31 Motion for Leave of Court to File an Amended Brief in Opposition to Defendant Albas Rule 12(b)(6) Motion (dkt. #21) is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to accept Plaintiffs Response [#31-1, #31-2, #31-3, #31-4, #31-5] to Defendants Motion to Dismiss [#21] for filing as of the date of this Minute Order. Defendant may file a Reply on or before May 3, 2016, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/19/16.(morti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01444-RBJ-KLM
MARK ALAN STREPKA,
Plaintiff,
v.
FRANCISCO L. ALBA, (14016), individually and in his official capacity as police officer in
and for the City and County of Denver, Colorado,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave of Court to File an
Amended Brief in Opposition to Defendant Alba’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion (dkt. #21)
[#31] (the “Motion”).
As an initial matter, the Motion does not comply with
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a), which provides as follows:
Before filing a motion, counsel for the moving party or an unrepresented
party shall confer or make reasonable good faith efforts to confer with any
opposing counsel or unrepresented party to resolve any disputed matter.
The moving party shall describe in the motion, or in a certificate attached to
the motion, the specific efforts to fulfill this duty.
The Motion is subject to denial on this basis alone. Nevertheless, in the interest of
expedience,1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#31] is GRANTED. Accordingly, the
Clerk of Court is directed to accept Plaintiff’s Response [#31-1, #31-2, #31-3, #31-4, #31-5]
to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [#21] for filing as of the date of this Minute Order.
Defendant may file a Reply on or before May 3, 2016.
Dated: April 19, 2016

1

Plaintiff is warned that any future motions which do not comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR
7.1(a) may be summarily denied.