Thiele et al v. Energen Resources Corporation
Filing
61
ORDER Granting 24 Plaintiff Gerald Ulibarris unopposed motion to dismiss without prejudice his claims against Defendant Energen Resources Corporation, which are set forth in the second, fourth, sixth, seventh, and eighth claims for relief of the First Amended Class Action Complaint. Dk. 2 , by Judge David M. Ebel on 10/1/2015.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Case No. 15-cv-01475-DME-KLM
CAROL THIELE,
LYNN SWANEMYR, AND
GERALD ULIBARRI
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ENERGEN RESOURCES CORPORATION
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF GERALD ULIBARRI’S UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE HIS CLAIMS AGAINST
ENERGEN RESOURCES CORPORATION
On this 1st day of October, 2015, this Court takes up Plaintiff Gerald Ulibarri’s
unopposed motion to dismiss without prejudice his claims against Defendant Energen Resources
Corporation, which are set forth in the second, fourth, sixth, seventh, and eighth claims for relief
of the First Amended Class Action Complaint. (Dk. 2). After considering said unopposed
motion (Dk. 24) and being duly advised in the matter:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), Plaintiff Gerald
Ulibarri’s claims against Defendant Energen Resources Corporation, which are set forth in the
second, fourth, sixth, seventh, and eighth claims for relief of the First Amended Class Action
Complaint, are dismissed without prejudice. This Order does not affect or pertain to the claims
of the other named plaintiffs in this case, Carol Thiele and Lynn Swanemyr.
BY THE COURT
s/ David M. Ebel
U.S. Circuit Court Judge
District of Colorado
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?