Aguilar v. Colorado State Penententry, et al
Filing
58
MINUTE ORDER denying 54 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24, and 55 "Motion for Admission of (2) Further Issues Desire to Raise on Appeal," by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/22/16.(dkals, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01481-LTB
LAZARO AGUILAR,
Plaintiff,
v.
COLORADO STATE PENETENTRY [sic], and
SAINT THOMAS MORE [sic] HOSPITAL,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
ENTERED BY SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK
Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Prisoner’s Motion and Affidavit for Leave to
Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24 (ECF No. 54;
April 8, 2016) and “Motion for Admission of (2) Further Issues Desire to Raise on
Appeal” [sic] (ECF No. 55; April 8, 2016). The Prisoner’s Motion and Affidavit for Leave
to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24 (ECF No.
54) is DENIED because the Court determined in the Order of Dismissal that leave to
proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be denied. (ECF No. 51 at 5). The
“Motion for Admission of (2) Further Issues Desire to Raise on Appeal” [sic] (ECF No.
55) appears to concern issues to be raised on appeal and is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE with leave to re-file in the appellate proceeding, Case No. 16-1135, before
the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Dated: April 22, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?