Jones v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
Filing
25
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/16/15. Plaintiff's Motion for Damages 22 is GRANTED, insofar as it seeks to provide a good faith basis for a computation of damages sought by Plaintiff in this matter; and The court DOES NOT CONSIDER the issue of whether Mr. Jones is entitled to any damages as reflected in the Motion for Damages, which is specifically reserved for futureconsideration in this matter. (bsimm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01488-REB-NYW
MARVIN R. JONES,
Plaintiff,
v.
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
This matter is before the court on the Motion for Damages [#22] filed by pro se Plaintiff
Marvin R. Jones (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Jones”) on October 30, 2015. The Motion for Damages was
referred to this Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Order of Reference dated
July 17, 2015 [#7], and the memorandum dated November 3, 2015 [#24]. During the Scheduling
Conference, this court ordered Mr. Jones to supplement the computation of damages that appears
in section 5 of the Scheduling Order. [#20; #21 at 7].
The court construes the pending Motion for Damages as Mr. Jones’ compliance with the
court’s prior order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED:
(a)
Plaintiff’s Motion for Damages is GRANTED, insofar as it seeks to provide a
good faith basis for a computation of damages sought by Plaintiff in this matter; and
(b)
The court DOES NOT CONSIDER the issue of whether Mr. Jones is entitled to
any damages as reflected in the Motion for Damages, which is specifically reserved for future
consideration in this matter.
DATED: November 16, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?