Beadnell v. Aramark Uniform Services
Filing
25
ORDER DISMISSING CASE on the parties Stipulated Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice ECF No. 24 . After a careful review of the motion, I find that it should be granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Accordingly, all claims asserted in this case are hereby dismissed, and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear her or its own attorney fees and costs, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 2/16/2016. (evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01508-WYD-KMT
BLANE BEADNALL,
Plaintiff,
v.
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES,
Defendant.
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the parties’ Stipulated Motion to
Dismiss With Prejudice (ECF No. 24). After a careful review of the motion, I find that it
should be granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Accordingly, all claims asserted in
this case are hereby dismissed, and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with
each party to bear her or its own attorney fees and costs.
Dated: February 16, 2016
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?