Merrill v. Standard Insurance Company et al
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Motion to Dismiss Party. Defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America and all claims that Plaintiff asserted or could have asserted against Unum, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff and Unum will each bear her or its own costs and attorneys' fees. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 10/19/2015. (athom, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01532-RM-MEH
TAMMY MERRILL,
Plaintiff,
vs.
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY and
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
DEFENDANT UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court, on Plaintiff Tammy Merrill’s and Defendant Unum Life
Insurance Company of America’s (“Unum”) Motion for Entry of Order Granting Stipulation for
Dismissal With Prejudice of Defendant Unum (ECF No. 23). Being fully advised in the
premises, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Tammy Merrill’s claims against Unum,
including all claims that Plaintiff asserted or could have asserted against Unum, are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff and Unum will each bear her or its own costs and attorneys’ fees
in connection with the litigation of Plaintiff’s claims against Unum. It is:
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Unum is dismissed as a party to this action,
with prejudice, and the case caption shall be amended to remove Unum as a named Defendant.
DATED this 19th day of October, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?