Roe v. Parkside Cardiology, LLC., et al
COURTROOM MINUTES/ MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: denying 33 Motion for Leave.. ORDERED: Doc 33 Proposed Order for Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint IS DENIED. ORDERED: A Second Amended Complaint is due by September 15, 2015. Upon the filing of this Amended Complaint the Court will file an Order overriding the prior Amended Complaints. ORDERED: Scheduling Conference is reset for October 14, 2015 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. FTR: Courtroom A501. (bdiem)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty
Civil Action No:
Date: September 8, 2015
FTR: Courtroom A 501
ATHENA MISHELLE ROE
PARKSIDE CARDIOLOGY, LLC.
CHAD C. SCHOOLEY (I)
PAUL D. SHERRY
PAUL D. SHERRY (I)
ERIK R. CARLSON
ERIK R. CARLSON (I)
BRIAN K. METZ
BRIAN K. METZ (I)
PAMELA A. TAYLOR
PAMELA A. TAYLOR (I)
WILLIAM LUECK (I)
COLORADO SPRINGS CARDIOLOGY
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
Court in session: 9:49 a.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
Discussion regarding recently filed Amended Complaint Doc. . Discussion regarding Motions
to Dismiss and Stays. Discussion regarding parties that are added and clarification on parties being
named in the Amended Complaints. Discussion of Service.
ORDERED: Doc  Proposed Order for Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended
Complaint IS DENIED.
ORDERED: A Second Amended Complaint is due by September 15, 2015. Upon the filing of
this Amended Complaint the Court will file an Order Overriding the prior Amended Complaints.
ORDERED: Scheduling Conference is reset for October 14, 2015 at 10:30 a.m.
Court in recess: 10:26 a.m.
Total time in Court: 0:37
*To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Stevens-Koenig Reporting at (303) 988-2483.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?