Roe v. Parkside Cardiology, LLC., et al

Filing 44

MINUTE ORDER granting 42 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/08/2015.(slibi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-01543-WJM-MEH THE ESTATE OF DR. CHRISTOPHER NORMAN TULIN, and ATHENA MISHELLE ROE, Plaintiffs, v. CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO, d/b/a Colorado Springs Cardiology, a Centura Health Clinic, and as Penrose-St. Francis Health Services, COLORADO SPRINGS CARDIOLOGISTS, P.C., a Colorado professional corporation, CHAD C. SCHOOLEY, PAUL D. SHERRY, PAMELA A. TAYLOR, ERIC R. CARLSON, BRIAN K. METZ, WILLIAM C. LUECK, and MICHAEL J. BARBER, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on October 8, 2015. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint [filed October 5, 2015; docket #42] is granted as follows. The Second Amended Complaint is accepted as filed. The Court notes that Plaintiff, as directed in the most recent Status Conference, only altered the caption, which leaves the “Parties” section of the Second Amended Complaint misaligned with the new caption. To the extent there are differences between the two, the caption will control moving forward, with those names and/or entities not listed in caption but listed in the “Parties” section disregarded. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the document (located at docket #42-1) as the Second Amended Complaint and to alter the caption on the Court’s electronic filing system to align with the caption on the Second Amended Complaint.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?