Mandy's Ltd et al v. TimePayment Corp., et al

Filing 28

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 24 First Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaim; denying without prejudice 26 Second Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaim, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/12/2015.(slibi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-01571-WYD-MJW MANDY’S LTD, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, and AMANDA MACHAN, Plaintiffs, v. TIMEPAYMENT CORP., a Delaware corporation, and SALON AND BEAUTY SOURCE, INC., a Floriday corporation, d/b/a SalonSmart, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant TimePayment Corp.’s first Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaim (Docket No. 24) and second Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaim (Docket No. 26) are both DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The moving Defendant’s certificate of conferral does not suggest that Defendant came anywhere near meeting its obligation to meet and confer with Plaintiff prior to filing these motions. D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a) requires the moving party to “make reasonable good faith efforts . . . to resolve any disputed matter.” This standard cannot be satisfied by sending a single email asking whether opposing counsel does or does not oppose the motion. Date: November 12, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?